Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Definition

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standardized analytical method for quantifying the environmental impacts associated with a product, service, or process across its entire life cycle—from raw material extraction through production, distribution, use, and end-of-life (reuse, recycling, or disposal). LCA follows ISO 14040/14044 standards and produces comparable, transparent results across defined system boundaries (e.g., cradle-to-gate, cradle-to-grave, cradle-to-cradle).

How it relates to marketing

LCA enables marketers to:

  • Substantiate sustainability claims (e.g., “lower carbon footprint than prior model”) with verified evidence.
  • Inform eco-design, packaging choices, and supplier messaging that reduce impacts meaningful to customers.
  • Create Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and support ESG disclosures.
  • Compare product variants to position “greener” options credibly and avoid greenwashing by anchoring claims in defensible data.

How to calculate

An LCA follows four iterative phases:

  1. Goal & scope definition
  • Purpose, intended audience, and decision context.
  • Functional unit (the quantified performance basis, e.g., “washing 1 kg of laundry at 40 °C”).
  • System boundaries (cradle-to-gate/grave/cradle), cut-off rules, and assumptions.
  • Allocation rules for multi-output processes (e.g., mass, energy, economic, system expansion).
  1. Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)
  • Compile input/output flows for each process in the system: materials, energy, transport, emissions, water, waste.
  • Data sources: primary supplier/process data and secondary databases (e.g., ecoinvent, USEEIO).
  • Ensure data quality on time, geography, and technology representativeness.
  1. Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)
  • Map inventory flows to impact categories via characterization models (e.g., ReCiPe, TRACI, ILCD).
  • Common categories: Climate change (GWP), Acidification, Eutrophication, Ozone depletion, Photochemical smog, Water use, Land use, Resource depletion, Human/ecotoxicity.
  1. Interpretation
  • Identify hotspots, test sensitivity/uncertainty, check completeness/consistency, and draw conclusions aligned with the goal and scope.
  • Optionally obtain critical review (required for comparative assertions disclosed publicly).

Core calculation pattern (illustrative):

  • Inventory flow for each process i, emission e:
    Load_e,i = Activity_i × EmissionFactor_e,i
  • Characterized impact for category c:
    Impact_c = Σ_e ( Load_e × CF_e→c )
  • Example for carbon footprint (GWP100):
    GWP = Σ_g ( Emissions_g × GWP100_g ), where g includes CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, etc., expressed as kg CO₂e.

Normalization/weighting (optional): Some methods normalize results to reference totals or apply weighting; use with caution and disclose transparently.

How to utilize (common use cases)

  • Product development & eco-design: Compare materials, manufacturing routes, and packaging to reduce hotspots.
  • Supplier and logistics decisions: Evaluate sourcing locations, transport modes, energy mixes.
  • Claims & labeling: Produce evidence-based comparisons and support EPDs and program rules.
  • Portfolio positioning: Differentiate “low-impact” lines; guide pricing or incentives.
  • Scenario planning: Model end-of-life strategies (recycling vs. landfill), refill/reuse systems, or renewable energy adoption.
  • Regulatory & buyer requirements: Support CSRD/SEC-adjacent reporting needs and B2B procurement questionnaires.

Comparison to similar approaches

ApproachPurposeScope & BoundaryOutputWhen to Use
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)Quantify multi-category environmental impacts across life cycleCradle-to-gate/grave/cradle; multiple categoriesImpact results (e.g., GWP, AP, EP) with documentationDesign decisions, verified claims, EPDs, hotspot analysis
Product Carbon Footprint (PCF)Climate impact onlySame boundaries as chosenkg CO₂eFast screening when carbon is primary concern
Scope 1/2/3 GHG InventoryOrganizational emissions accountingCorporate boundary per GHG Protocolt CO₂e by scopeEnterprise reporting and target setting
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)Total economic cost over lifeLife-cycle costs onlyCurrency by stageTCO comparisons and procurement
Materiality AssessmentIdentify priority ESG topicsEnterprise-level topicsRanked topicsStrategy and disclosure focus areas
Hotspot Screening (screening LCA)Rapid, lower-fidelity impact scanSimplified boundaries & dataIndicative impactsEarly design triage and quick comparisons

Best practices

  • Follow ISO 14040/14044; document assumptions, cut-offs, and allocation.
  • Define a clear, decision-relevant functional unit and appropriate system boundary.
  • Prioritize high-influence primary data; use quality secondary datasets for gaps.
  • Conduct sensitivity and uncertainty analyses; report data quality indicators.
  • Use recognized LCIA methods (e.g., ReCiPe, TRACI) and disclose versions.
  • Include a critical review for public comparative assertions or EPDs.
  • Maintain version control and audit trails in LCA software (e.g., SimaPro, GaBi, openLCA).
  • Align claims with the assessment’s scope; avoid over-generalization beyond the functional unit.
  • Refresh models periodically to reflect grid changes, process improvements, and supplier updates.
  • Tie insights to marketing actions (packaging changes, messaging guardrails, procurement criteria).
  • Real-time/automated LCA: Integration with PLM/ERP/digital twins to update impacts as designs or suppliers change.
  • Data sharing & verification: Greater primary data exchange across supply chains; use of product passports and verified EPDs.
  • Category/region harmonization: Wider adoption of consistent rules (e.g., program-specific PCRs, PEF rulesets).
  • AI-assisted gap filling: Improved estimation, anomaly detection, and uncertainty quantification for sparse supplier data.
  • Circularity modeling: Stronger treatment of reuse, repair, remanufacturing, and recycled content with transparent allocation.
  • Stakeholder scrutiny: Tighter guidance on claims to reduce greenwashing and ensure like-for-like comparisons.
  • Product Carbon Footprint (PCF)
  • Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)
  • Functional Unit
  • System Boundary (Cradle-to-Gate/Grave/Cradle)
  • Allocation (Mass/Economic/System Expansion)
  • Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)
  • Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)
  • ReCiPe / TRACI (LCIA methods)
  • Product Environmental Footprint (PEF)
  • Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
Next Article

Likert Scale